Showing posts with label newsday. Show all posts
Showing posts with label newsday. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

(0) Comments

Davidoff Correctly Forsees Doom


By combining a large payroll, aging players and a shallow farm system with their difficult start to the 2008 season, the Mets have created a high-stakes scenario for themselves.


Great stuff, including this question:


Who forms the nucleus of this Mets team for 2009 and beyond?




Not ending the Willie Watch seems to have started the Omar Watch. The fanbase is very very unhappy. A new stadium alone won't do it - any new stadium buzz will be overshadowed by the House That Yes Built.

Thursday, May 22, 2008

(0) Comments

Willie Watch: Mazzilli


Again I don't want to steal other people's hard work - this is from Newsday and Neil Best, but as Mazzilli Central I thought we should share.

Best transcribed Mazzilli on Willie. Here's a snippet

"I had a problem with that article, because he felt that it was kind of off the record. I know what Willie was going through by just chatting with this writer. I feel that there's an obligation for the journalist to ask that person if you really want to say this.

The entire piece is here

http://weblogs.newsday.com/sports/watchdog/blog/2008/05/lee_mazzilli_comes_to_defense.html

Sunday, May 18, 2008

(0) Comments

No Hockey!

Newsday reports that it looks like there won't be a hockey game at Yankee Stadium. That was an awful horrible idea. The last game at the Stadium should be a Yankee game - hopefully game four of the World Series, a loss to the Mets.

http://www.newsday.com/sports/hockey/rangers/ny-spoutgame0517,0,5862918.story

Thursday, May 15, 2008

(0) Comments

Newsday on "45,000"


The Mets Police brought this up about a month ago. You can announce 45,000 all you want (yeah yeah paid attendance) but the fact of the matter is the stadium is half empty. How many of you have season plans where you "eat" tickets?


"We trimmed the attendance again," the Old Perfessor used to say, which was 1962-speak for ripping off the fans. But back then, tickets cost a buck or two, games were over in a merciful two hours and nothing was expected of those Mets teams anyway.Forty-something years later, fans expect a bang or two for their 40 bucks a ticket and the three-plus hours spent shivering in a rusting junkheap of a ballpark. Mets fans have become notorious for their big mouths and short fuses, but last night, they booed loud, long and with plenty of justification.


Last night, more than 45,000 paid for their tickets and no more than half bothered to use them. The ones that did left disappointed, angered and in the idiom of Casey, trimmed.


Wallace Watthews in Newsday here

Thursday, May 08, 2008

(0) Comments

Let's Blame Willie For Long Games Too!


Quiet day. In Newsday today...

And if it feels like the Yankees, Red Sox and Mets play the longest games of all ... you're not imagining things. According to the Elias Sports Bureau, the Red Sox are the biggest offenders, at 3:08. Then come the Yankees, at 3:06. And the Mets top the National League at 3:01.

The Red Sox and Yankees both field lineups that emphasize selectivity at the plate. The Mets? I guess the lack of long outings by the starting pitcher leads to multiple pitching changes by Willie Randolph.

Sunday, May 04, 2008

(0) Comments

Wilpon Ignores Giants Again

Another in a long series of ignoring another baseball team ever played in New York City.

"The love of the game and this city is in my DNA," Wilpon said. "I've lived here all my life. People have asked me why I am building a smaller stadium . I didn't build a smaller stadium to make money. I'm doing it because that is the way to give fans the best experience of being close, like in Ebbets Field."

The rest in today's Newsday
http://www.newsday.com/services/newspaper/printedition/sunday/sports/ny-spwilpon045673509may04,0,3897483.story

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

(0) Comments

Mets Phony-Spin: Still Ignoring Giants

Wow. I can't believe it. It's as if New York never had a team that won 10 pennants and played at the Polo Grounds!

Green seats? Really? Green Seats are the shout out to the Giants? I'd like to thank the Orioles for honoring the Giants too.

Newsday.com
Giants fans won't be forgotten at Citi Field
Ken Davidoff


Gary Mintz of South Huntington, a Giants fan dating back to their days in the Polo Grounds, e-mailed me last week with this concern:"At the meeting of the New York Giants Baseball Nostalgia Society [recently], many of the members (all in their 60s through 80s) feel slighted that Mr. Wilpon has made Citi Field look like Ebbets Field and are honoring Jackie Robinson with the rotunda."Granted, he is the owner of the team, and the one who pays the bills.

But the old-timers feel that since the Mets took the orange of the Giants when they were formed, something in the stadium should honor the N.Y. Giants, whether it be a section or the like."That seemed like a reasonable question, so I took it to Mets COO Jeff Wilpon Tuesday. And Wilpon took me to Citi Field itself, to convey the message that, while the Dodgers - Fred Wilpon's favorite team as a Brooklyn youth - do get the majority of the love, you long-time Giants fans were not forgotten.While I'm not quite old enough to have made it to the Polo Grounds, it seems that Mintz and his fellow Giants loyalists will be heartened by two elements of the new, impressive ballpark:The seats are dark green, just like those at the Polo Grounds.

(WHAT??? Are you kidding me??? Green Seats = Remember The Giants??? Please.)

This serves a direct tribute to the Mets' first home, according to Dave Howard, the team's executive vice president of business operations.Citi Field's outfield features a plethora of unique angles and wall heights, as did the Polo Grounds. Consider this more of an indirect shout-out. "We looked at pictures of the Polo Grounds that made you think about it," Wilpon said.Wilpon wanted me to see the outfield because it was hard for him to put into words, and even after seeing it, it's difficult to describe it to you. The key area is right-centerfield. That's where the fence slams on the breaks and takes a sharp turn. It's not as deep as Fenway Park's "triangle" in centerfield. It's more of a right angle than a triangle. It should prove challenging for outfielders, and memorable for fans.Rightfield also has the upper-deck overhang in fair territory, reminiscent of the old Tiger Stadium, that should be manna to lefty pull hitters who can regularly put the ball in the air.The heights of the walls, too, stand out. The fence rises as high as 18 feet in left-centerfield, where it's 379 feet from home plate, and then down to eight feet in dead center, which rests 408 feet from the batter's box. In rightfield, where it's about 370 feet for a homer, it's back up to 14 feet.It's anything but a perfect replica of the Polo Grounds. But it's quirky like the Giants' long-time home, and its uniqueness will strike you - and, the Mets hope, their opponents, once Carlos Beltran and his corner outfielders get the hang of it."A lot of people said, 'Why don't you make it symmetrical?' " Jeff Wilpon said. "But symmetrical is not going to make it work. We want a homefield advantage."They should have that, and the old-time New Yorkers should possess some sense of comfort that the Mets know they are the National League descendants of both the Dodgers and the Giants.The ballpark, by the way, is scheduled to be completed on Jan. 25 of next year, giving the Mets a healthy 10 weeks or so of room for error.

NICE TRY METS. NICE TRY. WE'RE WATCHING YOU. YOU'RE NOT THE DODGERS AND YOU WILL NEVER BE THE BROOKLYN DODGERS. HONOR THE GIANTS CORRECTLY.